The High Court of Karnataka, in a criminal revision petition, granted permission to the petitioners to convert their petition into an appeal under Section 397 Section 401 CrPC. A one-week deadline was imposed for compliance.
Permission granted to convert the present petition into an appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.172 of 2013
BETWEEN:
(By Shri. S. Visweshwaraiah, Advocate)
AND:
Mr. Sanaulla, Son of Hagigar Usmonsab, Major, Residing at 2nd Cross, Ghouse Clinic,
2
Chintamani Town, Chintamani, Chikkaballapur District. …RESPONDENT
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.21 of 2012 dated 21.1.2013, passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Kolar.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo
seeking conversion of the present petition into an appeal.
The memo is placed on record and permission is granted
to convert the present petition into an appeal. One week’s
time is granted for compliance.
Sd/-
JUDGE
nv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to convert the criminal revision petition into an appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Shaik Zaheer
Mr. Shaik Afeeza
Mr. Sanaulla
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
