Smt Dr Uma v. Sri Prakash
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal reference petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the accused, appealing a sentence for cheque dishonour, argued the deposit requirement of the appellate court was illegal. The court noted the petitioner's absence and that an interim order dated 10.05.2012 had already directed a deposit, rendering the petition infructuous. The court accordingly disposed of the matter.
What did the court decide?
The criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was disposed of as infructuous due to the existence of an interim order on the same subject matter.