Single Judge of Karnataka High Court disposed of the contempt petition filed by complainant against accused for disobedience of an order, on submission that the prayed order was complied with, declaring the petition infructuous.
The instant contempt petition filed by the complainant is dropped/disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL 2013
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATIL
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. KUMARASWAMY
C.C.C.NO.304/2013 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
SRI VENKATAPPA NAYAK B SON OF DYAVANAYAK AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS RESIDING AT BEGUVALLI TIRTHAHALLI TALUK SHIMOGA-577 201.
.. COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI RAGHAVENDRA K.S., ADV. FOR M/S.LAW ASSOCIATES, ADV.)
AND
.. ACCUSED
(BY SRI.SANGAMESH G.PATIL, AGA FOR A-1 TO A-3;
SRI.G.S.BALAGANGADHAR, ADV. FOR A-4)
THIS CCC IS FILED U/S 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO INITIATE AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 9.11.2012 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.46052/2011.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, N.K.PATIL, J ., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
In the instant contempt case, the complainant has prayed to initiate contempt of court proceedings against the accused for disobedience of the order dated 9th November 2012 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.46052/2011 vide Annexure-A.
complainant does not survive for consideration. Hence, he submitted that the instant contempt petition be disposed of as having become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
SD/JUDGE
SD/JUDGE
KNM/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant contempt of court petition stands disposed of as infructuous due to compliance of the order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Bharatlal Meena
Sri. Vedamurthy
Smt. Vaishali
Sri P.G. Ramesh
N.K. Patil
C.R. Kumaraswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
