The Divisional Controller, v. Praveen S/O. Sangappa Byali
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew Writ Petition after settlement in Lok Adalath. Court recorded the memo and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Petitioner withdrew Writ Petition after settlement in Lok Adalath. Court recorded the memo and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO.62971 OF 2012(L-KSRTC)
Between:
The Divisional Controller, NWKRTC Belgaum Division, Belgaum, Represented by The Chief Law Officer, NWKRTC, Central Office, Gokul Road, Hubli.
..PETITIONER
(By Smt Shashikala L Desai, Adv)
And :
Shri Praveen, S/o Sangappa Byali, Age: 28 years, Occ: Nil, R/o Millat Nagar, Somanal Road, At: Post, Talikoti, Dist: Bijapur.
..RESPONDENT
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the award passed by the Additional Labour Court, Hubli in KID No.73/2010 dated 31.5.2011 in the ends of justice and equity at Annexure-E.
2
This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
A Memo has been filed by the counsel for the petitioner
seeking to withdraw the petition on the ground that matter has
been settled in Lok Adalath, Belgaum.
Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, petition is
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
bkp
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Divisional Controller, NWKRTC Belgaum Division, Belgaum, Represented by The Chief Law Officer, NWKRTC, Central Office, Gokul Road, Hubli
Shri Praveen, S/o Sangappa Byali
HULUVADI G RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court