Disposed

N Chelvaraju v. the Managing Director

Karnataka HC5 Nov 2012WP/43925/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed Respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner's representation regarding treatment as a person with disabilities and accommodation in a suitable light duty post within two months in terms of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to treat petitioner as a person with disabilities and accommodate him in a suitable light duty post within two months.

N Chelvaraju Vs the Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2012)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

¶3

DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.43925/2012 (S-KSRTC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

N CHELUVARAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O LATE M N NARASIMHAIAH R/A MANDAGERE AT & POST K R PET TALUK

¶9

MANDYA DISTRICT 571 423

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

( BY SRI.M.C.BASAVARAJU, ADV.,)

¶12

AND:

¶13

1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

¶14

KSRTC

¶15

CENTRAL OFFICES

¶16

K H ROAD

¶17

SHANTHI NAGAR

¶18

BANGALORE 560027

¶19

2 THE DIRECTOR

¶20

(PERSONNEL AND ENVIRONMENT)

¶21

KSRTC

¶22

CENTRAL OFFICES

¶23

K H ROAD

¶24

SHANTHI NAGAR

¶25

BANGALORE 560027

¶26

¶27

3 THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER

¶28

KSRTC

¶29

MYSORE URBAN DIVISION

¶30

BANNI MANTAP

¶31

MYSORE 570 001

¶32

...RESPONDENTS

¶33

( BY SMT. H.R. RENUKA, ADV.,)

¶34

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R3 TO ACCOMODATE THE PETITIONER ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVE SUITABLE POST [LIGHT DUTY] PERMANENTLY IN THE RESPONDENTS CORPORATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 47 OF THE PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES [EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, PROTECTION OF RIGHTS & FULL PARTICIPATION] ACT, 1995 WITH PAY PROTECTION AS HAS BEEN DIRECTED BY THE R2 VIDE NOTE DT.20.1.12, VIDE ANN-D, TO THIS WP.

¶35

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶36

ORDER

¶37

Smt. H.R. Renuka, learned counsel is directed to take notice for respondents.

¶38

In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent No.3 to accommodate him in any

¶39

other alternative suitable post (Light Duty) permanently in terms of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal

¶40

¶41

Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

¶42

It appears that the petitioner had made an application for treating him as a person of disabilities and even the respondents have also considered the same but, he has not been treated permanently as person of disabilities. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶43

If the representation is pending for consideration respondent No.3 is directed to consider the same in accordance with law and in accordance with the regulations of the Corporation, as early as possible but not later than

¶44

two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶45

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶46

Smt. H.R. Renuka is permitted to file vakalat in two

¶47

weeks.

¶48

Sd/JUDGE

¶49

PMR*

N Chelvaraju v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N Chelvaraju v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Guruprasad Vs State of Karnataka

M/S Repair and Return Technology (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr Mahesh K

M S Nagaraja Vs the Executive Director

K S Vasudeva Tatachar Vs State Bank of Mysore

Venkataramana J L Vs the Principal M/S Vijaya Motor Driving School

Sri Giriyappa Vs the Additional Labour Commissioner