Disposed

V R Shyanbhag S/O R P Shyanbhag v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC6 Mar 2012WP/12968/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition regarding the petitioner's claim for UGC pay scale and salary arrears without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the pending representations within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding salary arrears and pay scale within six months.

V R Shyanbhag S/O R P Shyanbhag Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2012)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD.

¶3

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2012

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.12968/2006 (S-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

V. R.Shyanbhag, U. K. District. S/c R.P.Shyanbhag, Lecturer in Psychology, Arts and Science, Kumta, Dr.A.V.Baliga College of Age: 40 years,

¶9

(By Sri. Lakshminarayana, Adv.)

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

AND:

¶12

Education Department, The State Of Karnataka M.S.Building, Bangalore-1. Rep By Its Secretary To Government

¶13

¶14

Palace Road, Bangalore-1. The Commissioner Of Collegiate Education

¶15

Palace Road, Bangalore-560 001. The Director Of Collegiate Education

¶16

4, Collegiate Education Dharwad. The Regional Director Of

¶17

¶18

Kumta-581 343, Uttara Kannada District, Kanara College Society (R) Rep By Its Secretary. 5.

¶19

Kumta, Uttara Kannada District. Dr A V Bailga College of Arts & Science, 6. He Principal,

¶20

(By Srl.P.H.Gotkhlndi, HCGP for Ri to R4; R5&R6-served) Respondents

¶21

scale and to continue the UGC pay scale as directed by this service I.e. form 18.7.1990 up to 17.9.2003 along with UGC pay Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to take This Petition Is filed Under ArtIcles 226 and 227 of the Hon’ble Court and etc. steps to pay the arrears of salary during the period of Ad-Hoc

¶22

group, this day, the court made the following: This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’

¶23

ORDER

¶24

W.P.No.21165/1992 dated 28.9.1994 vlde Annexure t continue the F” and aiso by this Court In the Instant case, the petitioner has sought for a UGC pay scale as directed arrears of salary during the period of ad-hoc service i.e., from mandamus to direct the respondents to take steps to pay the 18.7.1990 upto 17.9.2003 along with UGC pay scale and to In

¶25

¶26

22O8.1997 vide Annexure “G” lecturers’ case in as per the direction of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Stop Gap made by him requesting for payment of salary vide Annexures and has further sought for a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation SLP Nos.I.5840-46015/1997 disposed of on “K” and “L”.

¶27

request, is not justifiable. grievance petitioner submitted his detailed representation vide Annexures “K” and “L” requesting for payment of salary in view of the directions issued neither considered nor disposed of by taking any decision within has The he The said representation is of the 2. by this Court and the Apex Court. is that a reasonable time. Keeping in abeyance and not considering his

¶28

representations respondents demerits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction pass appropriate the consider the orders in the light of the Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits or petitioner vide Annexures “K” and directions issued by this Court in Writ to to of the “L” and

¶29

¶30

in if it is applicable to the case of the petitioner and dispose of the Nos.15840-16015/1997 vide Annexures “F” and “G respectively date of receipt of copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. same if not already considered and disposed of as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of six months from the Petition No.21165/1992 and also by the Apex Court SLP

¶31

JUDGE Sd!

¶32

kmv

V R Shyanbhag S/O R P Shyanbhag v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V R Shyanbhag S/O R P Shyanbhag v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmana Vs the Commissioner City Municipality

Ratnavva Vs Hubli Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.

S N Haveri Vs the General Manager (Administrative and Hrd)

Mr Satish Gajanan Pawar Vs the State of Karnataka

Jayaram Krishnappa Shetty Vs the Labour Commissioner and Presiding Officer

Sri Santhosh S/O Basavaraj Ambadagatti Vs the Chief General Manager Karnataka Telecom Circle