The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the first regular appeal as withdrawn on the grounds of a memo signed by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1209/2010
BETWEEN:
SRI MARI JOSEPH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O. AROGYA SWAMY, RESIDING AT NO. 3/3, GUJJARAPPA GARDEN, DODDIGUNTA, SARVAGANA NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 005
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI MUSHTAQ AHMED & ABDUL KHADAR, ADVS.)
AND:
2
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC. 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 19.03.2010 PASSED IN O.S. NO.4068/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE IX-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The memo dated 11.07.2012 has been filed on behalf of the
appellant, which is signed both by the appellant as well as the learned counsel. The appellant who is present in person confirms that he has signed the memo. The memo reads as under:-
“The appellant does not press this appeal and the same may dismissed as not pressed.”
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
ST*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI MARI JOSEPH
SRI B. KRISHNAPPA
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(E3), BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERATE BOARD
A.S. BOPANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
