The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a miscellaneous civil appeal under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for non-prosecution, leading to the dismissal of a connected motion for permission to file additional documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.ABDUL NAZEER
MISC.CVL. Nos.8230/10 & 8229/10 IN R.S.A.No.334 OF 2010 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
H.N. VEERABHADRAIAH S/O DODDA NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT HALEHALLI MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT. ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI SURESH D DESHPANDE, ADV.)
AND:
(BY SRI BASAVARAJ M.MEKKI, ADV. FOR R1 & R2(a)
PROPOSED RESPONDENTS
2
GANGASANDRA POST, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
2 GOWRAMMA, W/O LATE PUTTANANJAPPA, D/O LATE DODD NANJAPPA, AGE 80 YEARS, R/AT VITAKAPALLI VILLAGE AND (PO) PARAGI MANDAL, HINDUPUR TALUK, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
(BY SRI S.S.ZULAPI, ADV.)
MISC.CVL. No.8230/10 IS FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC FOR IMPLEADING.
MISC.CVL. No.8229/10 IS FILED UNDER 41 RULE 27 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
THESE MISC.CVL.’s COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
None appears for the applicants in
Misc.Cvl.No.8230/10.
prosecution. Consequently, Misc.Cvl. No.8229/10 is
also dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
KLY/
2 provisions across 1 enactments
H.N. VEERABHADRAIAH S/O DODDA NANJAPPA
SRI NANJUNDAPPA S/O BASANNA AND OTHERS
S.ABDUL NAZEER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
