The High Court of Karnataka allowed a miscellaneous civil application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a delay of 64 days in filing an appeal, basing its decision on the statements and affidavit filed by the appellant.
Delay of 64 days in filing the appeal is condoned and the application is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2012
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA
MISC.CVL. NO.7113 OF 2011 IN MFA NO.2876 OF 2011 (MV)
BETWEEN:
Sri.P.R.Sheshagiri Rao.
… APPELLANT.
(By Smt.Prabha R.Girimaji, Adv.)
AND:
Srimathi Yashodamma and another. …RESPONDENTS.
(By Sri.Ashok N.Patil, Adv. for R-2,
Notice to R-1 – dispensed with vide order dated 08.02.12)
-------
This Misc.Cvl. is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 64 days in filing the appeal.
This Misc.Cvl. coming on for Further Orders this day, N.K.PATIL J., made the following:
2
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, Misc. Cvl. is allowed.
Delay of 64 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
AGV.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 64 days in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act can be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri.P.R.Sheshagiri Rao
Srimathi Yashodamma and another
N.K.PATIL
S.N.SATYANARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
