Disposed
Shekar Babu v. T R Manjunath
Karnataka HCMFA/3003/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE BEFORE…
What the court decided
AI extract
SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE BEFORE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
BEFORE IHELOKAD cr
IN HE lUG I COURT OF IL4RN4TAKA AT BNGAt ORE
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE. 2012
(ON JLIA OR’ RESF 1’:
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AS BOPAI NA AND
SRI. K,MNATAJ, MEMBER
\o Misc Ilancous First Appeal No 300 009 L \sh
BETWEEN:
H [1 \ 207. \ dh LtUj I iV1U ll iz’ar Appellant ii ‘:; 2S U
Sr n ha oc’
AND:
f Z 1 ‘(Ij N’ ( 11fr 1 21
IL
Rc pcsr1ae Its
‘a ha cd El I
Ijfl% ti.\ T ‘1’ W •(.M%t ‘III ‘1 !N ‘V ‘R’ J!i ‘‘ 2.I’ .!‘ft” I.’Si1) X ‘P.i Nt)S.*j ‘ft1, ( \ ‘JP 1111 ‘“ I 1” .9 fl(jj_ CL’; Ri 01 sM.V :. C AFs. IttI.’< M ‘ I \‘r 4(lj’( ,l \ \k •,,f,‘. ‘:c I 1j j_l )j( .It: (I M%1 J Lii )N j(a :‘\tI , 1L\’ i I ‘%S’0 II. c )(1 11 1_’I I •1 I 1 (‘ ri ;i. ill fl’ M1\i .\D ‘. C• •• T’%.\I!( \ ii3 I;
CON ILIATION ORDER
.\trrr T’eu’’lsahiniL%. liii Ihi1_lirt h.n. €ILPL’J t(’ %t’ItIt the fl1lt1t 1. Iht’ ferinI ‘fl1flcI for I)lt• ‘1:umanl tia— .itrerd to r’ tt-ivt lubal corn O.OuQ pee’ fl n I usatid on itt a ial Miet a tIc (1 1 Sdfli( tial: aid linal —.eulcnwnt ol idnt anoii cf k duiin.
The am.. nit Ps 10 ‘)flO•’ shrll be ‘it p(’ited ‘.y The 1 iNC t Pcr;od I s f )t 1% ‘ it Ii•iI ‘iIeI( i1( p 1 1 rI.i:’ ..i ;1 : •— I ‘;‘ i;.’ ..4 ‘‘ ii.,.,% Cl% ji: ‘!.;‘‘ ta:. , :j i fl’ I I I S . I 1. clatc it . tJ 1 1 ilbf i, ‘I iii ‘VIII 4 a
C
EL
IHELKAD
Krishnaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court