Dismissed
Smt. Balavva W/O Laxman Jandekurbar v. the Divisional Controller
Karnataka HCMFA/23881/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS St1 THE DAY OF JUNE, 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B. ADI
M.F.A.NO.23881/2011 (MV)
BETWEEN:
TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELGAUM
TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELGAUM
TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELGAUM
:2:
R/O SHREE VENKATESH NAGAR, MUDALGI,
TQ. GOKAK,
DIST. BELGAUM. ... APPELLANTS
(By Sri.ASHOK ANNAPPA NAIK, ADV.)
AND
THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD:16.12.2008 PASSED IN MVC.NO.2153/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER MACT-IV, BELGAUM AND III ADDL. DIST. JUDGE, BELGAUM, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THE APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsel for the appellants has filed a Memo
seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
withdrawn
sub!
BALAVVA W/O LAXMAN JANDEKURBAR & ORS.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, BELGAUM DIVISION
SUBHASH B. ADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court