Disposed
Mr H Kanumappa v. Mr S P Shivashankarappa
Karnataka HCMFA/2309/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SERVICES COMMITIEE, BANGALORE BEFORE THE LOK…
What the court decided
AI extract
SERVICES COMMITIEE, BANGALORE BEFORE THE LOK…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITIEE, BANGALORE
N HE HIGH COURT uf KAk4TkKA 1 BflG’ORF
DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF AUGUST, 2012
CONCILIAT ORS PRESENT
HONBLE MWJUSTICE WMANOHAR AND
SRI M U POONACHA MEMBER
Miscellaneous First AppçaI No.2309/2010 Lok Adalat No.07/2012
BET EEN.T
1 1 I t nt Appellant S/ /b Mr HR ii iflLiD’tJ, kg 1, )f 111111:111 IHIriL
h y KShhk s A £
AND
I I i I:’-i 1 I I 1 .Ttit R spo der s (By Sri M arayanappa d? ocate to1 R2) ir LJ h 1c ‘im t1 ir-r r’ it F
%T COMINONI)RC)WI1MbOfl F)! 4 ORDFR 1flTh16 122(111. THE 1-OTIOWING ORDER IS OK1iA1 .Ft fl’IG TtE$VNNEI) VIOl THIS PI PAS?.)
ccSPJaflQNQRPJR
The learned cowr’el for the Appellant Claimant and the learned
a. 1 ci 1)1 hi a. rt i’c pre c at Co iipan ii ng Uth its n.prr’wntatlve ne
Respnden Insurana Conipanv has agreed to pay a Ii. mp sum £ &s.50.OO )I Mc r j rok nge I awel to receic matter li is is fled x bei ‘aIf of the parties to ills effect the app at.aanat ni negotiations settled. The (Rupees Fifty Thousand only). m addition to what his been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. A Join Mcn o 2
mc lit bef re the Tnbunai within ‘ix weeks from thc date of tic s&iaaoa.n iatt cpr tn In rd cep CIj, ‘ciii he still The Respnndent - Insurance Company has agrc ed to depos’t the Sot? twit tittnfdttaiilt. iii Ii 3 pspyp%tq)ape ‘cr17 1
Tneenn’ r-ii (lcmplsairau) 141 ‘1 ‘CL favour c.t tI,r .a.ppcllart 1 1
,0 4
iT’s ‘.1’ ‘Il i.uvl mociiInI I I -C C l’rlbnial if mint .iwtrd .t ‘lit )i 5 1’hi’ nht%r.’IlancolLs firci. appeal 1anLIs dkpc.srcl of m terjn% nf ‘iii nir. lilt Ii
34
RR
Respondent
Insurance Company
Manohar
Poonacha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court