A revision petition under Section 46(1) of the Karnataka Recast Act was dismissed for non-compliance with office objections within the prescribed two weeks' time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H.R.R.P.No.8/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
HRRP No.8/2012
BETWEEN:
SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE THAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.6/52, GROUND FLOOR I MAIN, 3RD CROSS, AZADNAGAR CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560 018 ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI D SESHADRI, ADVOCATE – ABSENT)
AND:
SMT. PUSHPAMMA W/O M VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.6/52, 1ST FLOOR I MAIN, 3RD CROSS, AZADNAGAR CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE-560 018 ... RESPONDENT
HRRP FILED UNDER SEC.46(1) OF KR ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 29.09.2011 PASSED IN HRC.60/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/SEC.27(2)(a) OF K.R. ACT.
HRRP COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
H.R.R.P.No.8/2012
O R D E R
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
Two weeks' time was granted on 08.06.2012 to comply with the office objections failing which it was
ordered that the petition would stand dismissed. Till date, office objections have not been complied with.
Hence, no further order is necessary.
Revision petition dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
hkh/ata.
SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE THAYAPPA
SMT. PUSHPAMMA W/O M VENKATESH
H.G.RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
