Dismissed

M/S. N S Electricals v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.

Karnataka HC24 Aug 2012CRL.RP/164/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Before the High Court Legal Services Committee Lok Adalat, the court recorded a settlement between the petitioner firm and Crompton Greaves Ltd regarding a dishonoured cheque (CC No.27873/2002). The parties agreed to a compensation of Rs.4,55,000 (four lakh fifty-five thousand). Upon settlement, the court acquitted the accused and disposed of the revision petition by dismissing the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The accused has been acquitted of the offence charged. The appeal filed against the order is dismissed. An application u/s 147 of NI Act filed by the parties is permitted; the matter has been compromi

M/S. N S Electricals Vs Crompton Greaves Ltd. — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2012)

¶1

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF IRNATAI AT BANGALORE

¶3

DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST, 2012

¶4

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶5

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BNYINTO AND

¶6

SRI. AKABHAT, MEMBER

¶7

Criminal RevijpPetition No464 2009 Lok Adalat NoThl/2012

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

— 560 050. ro.oso, 1) Floor, M/sN1)Eieetrieals, (>.5c Petitioners Baoashco.kah Ban faInwe Cross. Banasbaoka Si i Sta.ge. 2’° Block, Rep. by its Partner, Soil..Naiina. Slra.nl.nar, I. Sort ,Nalini Shankar. 2. Pa.ri o.er. No 1)80. A Partnership Firm, 1St Floor.. Hr

¶10

(By Sri. Ramaehandra GBhat, Advocate) AND:

¶11

— ( ) t. : is r:.t rioti ()• Respondent wrt 10 Baotaft Crompton Greaves Ltd. loor. (By N /sLex Plexus, Advocat.e) i.a.Lsi:ani kiaai. 511)0 tier. 2w Cress 8 Gain. Hi Block., Javanagara. t<ej) Lv :51st ‘2

¶12

¶13

CRL.RP FILED 13/5.401 CR.P.C. BY TIlE ADVOCATE FOR THE PIV1TflONER (CCH-37) AT BANGALORE IN CRL.A.472/2006 AND ACQUIT THE PEITI’IONERS 1 AND IYL2:3-] -2009 PASSE!) BY TIlE XXXVI AI)DL. CITY CML AN!) SESSIONS JUI)GE PRAYING TI (AT 1’IIIS I ION1fl..E cour MAY BE PLEASE!) TO SET ASII)E TFIE ORDER OF THE XX ACMM AN!) XXII A5CJ. I3ANGALORE CITY. I3ANGALORE AN!) THE ORI)ER OF CONVICITON DATED 15-02-2006 PASSED IN C.C.NO.27873/2002 ON THE FILE

¶14

PASSE!). BEING REFERRET) VIDE ORDER I)TI). 10-08-2012. TIlE FOLLOWING ORDER IS THIS CRLRP COMING ON FOR CONCI1IAflTON BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFtER

¶15

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶16

a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- as compensation as fine with the direction Rs.4.55.000/- (Rupees Four Lakh Fifty Five Thousand only) in full and final settlement of the cheque amount In CC No.27873/2002. passed by the XX ACMM and XXII ASCJ, Bangalore City in This Crl.R.P. is filed challenging the order dated 15-2-2006 appeal filed against the order is dismissed. The parties have filed a to pay Rs.6.44.846/- as compensation to the Complainant. The memo stating that the matter has been compromised for a sum of CC No.27873/2002 in which the accused has been directed to pay

¶17

same. the parties are permitted to compound the offence. An application u/s. 147 of NI. Act has also filed. In view of the

¶18

set askie and the accused is acquit of the oflènce charged against him. The petition is closed, rifle Complainant is Prtsdflt and has In view of the settlement, the Judent dated 15-2-2006 is

¶19

I ‘ i 1 1— 1 I fir. 115 [ tI r iit ii H 1:1’ II HI i i. t 11 ;f Iit iii I Ic

¶20

1’

¶21

M/S. N S Electricals v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. N S Electricals v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H B Harish S/O Basappa Vs K C Ravi S/O Channappa Gowda

Dr Shiva Prakash S/O Shambulingaiah Vs Ramesh Rao S/O Narashinga Rao

Narayanappa @ Narayanaswamy Vs M/S Kallam Agra Products

Sri M Mohan Vs Sri Mohamad Aslam

Smt Lakshmamma Vs Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Rajashekar N Vs M/S Tata Aig Insurance