Appeal dismissed by the circuit bench after acquittal by the Sessions Court. The judge held the seizure question is not proved as the accused and articles are in police possession; the eyewitness did not appear.
Appeal dismissed; order of acquittal affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I
Ni r
BETWEE N
_t S. I - }
(By Sn Ni u dl M I) ai AddI, PPJ
TNT):
I
I c
I
Nr1 riI .n n - t.g
j I ( i • • I I it I (H \ I! ) H
I I ii
I DGMNi
£ • I - • - £1 lw iH - ii I
£ • 1 Ii / H
I
4
e
Judge does not call br interference. appear to he the eyewitness to seizure and recovery. already arrested and articles are in possession o police. The order of acquittal l)asscdi in’ 11w Sessions Therefore, the quest ion of seizure of articles is riot proved. His evidence discloses that the accused persons vere
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.
Sd JUDGE
LG
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Appeals Court should interfere with the acquittal order of the Sessions Court on the issue of seizure of articles.
Unknown Judge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
