Vinod Goel v. Dr B H Ravindra Pai
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal petition, the petitioner challenged the proceedings in C.C. No. 567/2009 initiated under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, contending that the complaint was filed with unlawful intention by the respondents after cancelling a sale agreement and forfeiting advances.
What the court decided
8
9 0
U
m D0 UII0 tz
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF JUNE 2012
BEFORE
THE HOWBLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH & AOl
çgIAfETITIONjjO:10j2012
VINODGOEL
CHA;RMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR TWENTY FIRST CENTRURY WIRE RODS LTD RMV EXTN, BENGALOORU 560 080 #408, 12TH MAIN, SADASHIVANAGAR,
PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. VINAYA KEERTHY, ADV.,)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the proceedings in C.C. No. 567/2009 for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
Whether the complaint was filed with unlawful intention by the respondents after cancelling the agreement and forfeiting the advance amount.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod Goel
- respondent
Bhuvindra Pal
- respondent
B. H. Narendra Pal
- respondent
B. H. Jayanth Pal
- respondent
B. H. Srikant Pal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/107/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court