Paro Devi v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as abated after petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner had died.
Writ petition dismissed as abated after petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner had died.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:28256
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 7412 of 2026
Paro Devi, Aged about 48 Years, Wife of Late Prakash Prajapati, Resident of Village- Hazari Basti, P.O:-Swang, P.S. Gomia, District Bokaro (Jharkhand), 829128 ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Laxmi Devi, Advocate Mr. Krishna Prajapati, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr. SC-I
Order No. 2 /Dated: 17th September 2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has died as such, he cannot argue this case.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
17th September 2026 Amit Uploaded on 21/09/2026
1
Paro Devi
The State of Jharkhand
The Chief Engineer, Bokaro Thermal, BTPS, D.V.C.
Executive Engineer, Bokaro Civil Division, DVC, Bokaro
The Director (HRD), Damodar Valley Corporation
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court