The petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. With no objection from the respondents, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:28188
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S). No. 7383 of 2026
Sadhu Kumar Singh, aged about 36 years, s/o. late Arjun Singh, R/o. Q. No. M-47, BN-3, Central Colony Chandrapura, P.O. & P.S. Chandrapura, Dist. Bokaro. ………. Petitioner
Versus
………. Respondents .
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate ----------
this Court for withdrawal of the instant application.
2. There is no objection from the other side.
3. Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
17th September, 2026 kunal/Uploaded 20.09.2026
1
Sadhu Kumar Singh
The Central Coalfields Ltd.
The Director (Personnel/IR & MP), Central Coalfields Limited
The General Manager, Dhori Area, Central Coalfields Ltd.
The Area Manager, Central Coalfields Ltd., Bermo
The Project Officer, SDOCM, Dhori Colliery, Central Coalfields Ltd.
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
