Allowed

Geeta Devi v. the Bank of Baroda

Jharkhand HC15 Sept 2026WPC/7290/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This disposed writ petition sought permission to withdraw the petition to file an appeal before the Debts and Recovery Appellate Tribunal against a DRT order. The prayer was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty given to approach the DRT. The issue of limitation was expressly kept open. An interim application was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to withdraw writ petition to approach the Debts and Recovery Appellate Tribunal is allowed. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty. Issue of limitation kept open.

Geeta Devi Vs the Bank of Baroda — Banking and Recovery | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:JHHC:27731

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(C) No. 7290 of 2026

¶3

Geeta Devi, W/o Binod Kumar Baitha, R/o Tiril Ashram, Kute, PO Tiril Ashram, PS New Vidhan Sabha, District Ranchi

¶4

.... Petitioner(s).

¶5

Versus

¶6

1.The Bank of Baroda through the Managing Director, A Body Corporate Constituted under The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act 1970, having its Head Office at Mandavi, Baroda in the State of Gujarat and it has Branches throughout India and one of such branches as Ratu Road, PO Hehal, PS Sukhdeonagar Dist Ranchi

¶7

2.The Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Ratu Branch, PO Hehal, PS Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi

¶8

3.The Regional Office Recovery Team, through the Regional Recovery Head, Bank of Baroda, having its Regional Office, Near Sujata Cinema Hall, PO- GPO, Ranchi, PS Hindpiri, District Ranchi

¶9

4.The Debts and Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi, Through, the Presiding Officer, 5^th Floor, Pragati Sadan, R.R.D.A. Building, Kutchery Road, PO- GPO Ranchi, PS Kotwali, District Ranchi

¶10

5.M/s The Natural Atta, A Partnership Firm, having its registered Office Unit No.1, at Village Saher Semar, PO Ratu, PS Ratu, District Ranchi through its Proprietor Ramesh Mahto, S/o Tetru Mahto, R/o Sahar, PO Nagri, PS Nagri, District Ranchi 6.M/s The Natural Atta, A Partnership Firm, having Its another unit No.2 at Panda, Bareera City, PO Nagri, PS Nagri, District Ranchi, through its Proprietor, Ramesh Mahto, S/o Tetru Mahto, R/o H. No.42, Saher Samertoli, PO Piska, PS Nagri, District Ranchi

¶11

7.Ramesh Mahto, S/o Tetru Mahto, R/o House No.42 Saher Semar Toli, PO Piska, PS Piska Nagri, District Ranchi

¶12

8.Pradeep Baitha, S/o Mahadev Baitha, R/o House No.35A, Kute, PO Tiril Ashram, PS New Vidhan Sabha, District Ranchi … Respondent(s).

¶13

…… CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. -----For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Bank : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate

¶14

02/ 15.09.2026: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this

¶15

writ petition to approach the Debts and Recovery Appellate Tribunal for

¶16

filing an appropriate appeal against the order passed by the DRT.

¶17

Prayer is allowed.

¶18

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶19

The issue of limitation is kept open.

¶20

I.A. No. 7379 of 2026 stands disposed of.

¶21

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

¶22

15^th September, 2026

¶23

R.S./ Uploaded on 17/09/2026

Geeta Devi v. the Bank of Baroda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Geeta Devi v. the Bank of Baroda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases