Disposed

Satyendra Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC14 Sept 2026WPC/7130/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought liberty to approach the One-Man Fact Finding Committee headed by Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary, submitting that the issue was similar to W.P.(S) No. 582 of 2023. The respondents did not object. The court disposed of the writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file the writ application with annexures before the Committee.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the One-Man Fact Finding Committee by filing the writ application with annexures.

Satyendra Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand — Service and Employment | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:JHHC:27640

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

W.P. (S) No. 7130 of 2026

¶4

Satyendra Kumar Singh, aged about 40 years, son of Bir Bahadur Singh, resident of Road No.6, Krishnapuri, P.O. and P.S. Chutia, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand.

¶7

The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S-Jagarnathpur, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶8

The Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶9

The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶10

The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi through its Secretary, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.O. and P.S.- Namkum, District Ranchi.

¶11

The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.O. and P.S. Namkum, Ranchi. .... Respondent(s)

¶12

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

¶13

¶14

For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Bharti V. Kaushal, Advocate Mr. Prabhakaran Munda, Advocate Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. Oishi Das, A.C. to A.G. Mr. Tejo Mistri, Advocate

¶15

02/Dated: 14.09.2026

¶16

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this writ application is same and similar with that of W.P. (S) No. 582 of 2023 with analogous cases in which the petitioners were given liberty to approach the One-Man Fact Finding Committee; as such, the instant writ application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the One-Man Fact Finding Committee headed by Justice

¶18

¶19

2026:JHHC:27640

¶20

Gautam Kumar Choudhary. It is further prayed that the instant writ application along with additional documents may be permitted to be treated as an application before the One-Man Fact Finding Committee.

¶21

3. There is no objection from the respondents.

¶22

4. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the OneMan Fact Finding Committee by filing copy of the writ application along with its annexures and other documents, if so advised.

¶23

(Deepak Roshan, J.)

¶24

SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 vikas/uploaded 22/09/2026

¶25

Satyendra Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases