Dismissed

Prashant Kumar Jain v. Union of India, through Its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance

Jharkhand HC11 Sept 2026WPC/6945/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner approached High Court via writ regarding a grievance already pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The court held that the DRT has jurisdiction and disposed of the writ petition, in addition to pending interim applications.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of. Pending Interim Application stands disposed of.

Prashant Kumar Jain Vs Union of India… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:JHHC:27393

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.6945 of 2026

¶3

----Prashant Kumar Jain, son of late Ramesh Kumar Jain, resident of Ranchi Road Marar, PO Marar Police Station-Mandu, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s).

¶4

Versus

¶5

1.Union of India, through its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance at 3^rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, PO and PS Parliament Street, New Delhi

¶6

2.Debts Recovery Tribunal Ranchi, through Registrar, Pragati Sadan, 5^th Floor, Kutchery Chow, PO GPO, PS Kotwali, District Ranchi

¶7

3.Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., 56, 5^th Floor, Free Press House, Nariman Point, PO New Yogkshem, PS Marine Drive, District Mumbai City, Mumbai (Maharastra)

¶8

4.The Authorised Officer, Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., 54, Ekdalia Road, 1^st Floor, Gariahat, PO and PS Gariahat, District Kolkata (West Bengal)

¶9

5.M/s Jyoti Enterprises, through its Partner Ajit Kumar, a partnership firm having its office at G.T. Road, Barkatha, PO and PS Barkatha, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

¶10

6.Patni Sheet Griha Private Limited, registered office Ranchi Road Marar, Post Office Marar, Police Station Mandu, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand … Respondent(s).

¶11

CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. -----For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the UOI : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, DSGI Mr. Karbir, AC to DSGI

¶12

07 / 11.09.2026 : Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents.

¶13

2. The petitioner had already approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Ranchi for the reliefs claimed.

¶14

3. Thus, the petitioner should approach the DRT as the grievance raised by the petitioner comes within the jurisdiction of the DRT. It is expected that the DRT will take up the matter and

¶15

¶16

2026:JHHC:27393

¶17

address the grievance of the petitioner.

¶18

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶19

5. Pending I.A. stands disposed of.

¶20

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

¶21

11.09.2026 Tanuj/CP-2

¶22

Uploaded on 14.09.2026

¶23

Prashant Kumar Jain v. Union of India, through Its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Kumar Jain v. Union of India, through Its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases