Dismissed¶¶23

Ekta Kumari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC6 Jan 2026WPC/5510/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ekta Kumari; Lusi Kumari; Mayalata Hembrom; Sohagini Hembrom; Nutan Kumari; Kanchan Kumari; Ranjana Kumari v. State of Jharkhand; W.P.(S) No. 5510 of 2019; High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi; Justice Deepak Roshan (single judge); withdrawal of writ application; dismissed as infructuous; decision date 06.01.2026; respondents include Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer Giridih/Deoghar/Jamshedpur and Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission; counsel: Rishi Raj Verma (petitioners), Shivam Singh A.C. to S.C.-II (respondents), Sanjoy Piprawall and Prince Kumar (JPSC); no statutes cited; no cases cited; no issues framed; no holdings; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ application was granted and the application was dismissed as infructuous. ¶¶23

Ekta Kumari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:422

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5510 of 2019

¶3

Ekta Kumari, aged about 44 years, wife of Ravindra Mahto, resident of Naya Tola, Shekpura, P.O. and P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar.

¶4

Lusi Kumari, aged about 41 years, wife of Raj Kumar Singh, resident of Chitragupt Colony, Kundu Bunglow, Ward No. 18, P.O. and P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar.

¶5

Mayalata Hembrom, aged about 44 years, wife of Sucipitar Murmu, resident of Kanichihar, Chandauri, P.O. and P.S. Tisri, District Giridih.

¶6

Sohagini Hembrom, aged about 48 years, wife of Nikolas Hansda, resident of Village Hathiyarihari, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District Godda.

¶7

Nutan Kumari, aged about 31 years, wife of Sudhanshu Kumar, resident of Ramchandrapur, Near Old Police Phadi, Semariya, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar.

¶8

Kanchan Kumari, aged about 34 years, wife of Sikandar Prasad, resident of Bara Shekhpura (Kundu Bangala), Madhupur, P.O. and P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar.

¶9

Ranjana Kumari, aged about 28 years, daughter of Ranjeet Mahto, wife of Uday Shankar Mehta, resident of Naya Tola, Bada Madhupur, P.O. and P.S. Shekhpura, …. District Deoghar. Petitioner(s)

¶10

-VERSUS-

¶11

The State of Jharkhand.

¶12

The Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi.

¶13

The Secretary, Department of Health Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi.

¶14

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Giridih, P.O. and P.S. Giridih, District Giridih.

¶15

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar.

¶16

¶17

2026:JHHC:422

¶18

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Bistupur, District-East Singhbhum. 7. Jharkhand Staff Selectin Commission, through its Secretary office at Chaibagan, Kali Nagar, P.O. & P.S.Namkom, District-Ranchi. …..Respondent (s)

¶19

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

¶20

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Verma, Adv For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Shivam Singh, A.C. to S.C.-II For the JPSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Adv Mr. Prince Kumar, Adv

¶21

04/06.01.2026

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application as the same has become infructuous.

¶23

2. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed as infructuous.

¶24

(Deepak Roshan, J)

¶25

06.01.2026

¶26

Amardeep/ Uploaded