Furthermore, by virtue of modification/amendment pursuant to the JBCCI Meeting, whereby the definition of dependent was modified and that modification became part and parcel of the original NCWA-XI and undisputedly the said amendment will have to operate prospectively; and admittedly, when an application was filed within the period of limitation of 18 moths as per the terms of concerned NCWA and at that time the said instruction was under operation; then there is no reason why the respondents will deny the compassionate appointment to unmarried sister. 15. In other words, the moment I.I. No.16 became part and parcel of original agreement i.e. NCWA-XI; though operating prospectively, but in any view of the matter on that implementation date it became part parcel of NCWA-XI for the purpose of giving compassionate appointment as per Clause 9.3.0 of NCWA-XI; therefore, when the application for compassionate appointment was made within the stipulated time of 18 months from the date of death of the deceased employee; and by virtue of said instruction, unmarried sister was included in the list of dependent; there is no reason why the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment was rejected. 16. Ld. Counsel for the Respondents has heavily relied on the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 533 of 2024 and submits that the issue involved in this writ application is covered by the said judgment, however, after going through the aforesaid judgment, the factual matrix of the said case and the instant one are entirely different. In the said case the instruction was not applicable during the currency period of NCWA-XI; rather the same was within the currency period of NCWA – X and therefore the Division Bench of this Court has held that “to claim
