Petitioner alleged private respondents were interfering with his possession of land at Mouza Hethu despite dismissal of a title suit. The High Court directed him to approach the Sub-Divisional Officer, Ranchi with an application under Section 143 BNSS to be decided per law after hearing parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3571 of 2026
2026:JHHC:14463
Ramesh Sahu, aged about 63 years Son of Late Bona Sahu, resident of Village Airport Hundru, P.O.-Hundru, P.S.-Airport, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand, 834003 .... Petitioner(s).
Versus
------CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Robin Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shashwat Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC-I
------
02/ 12.05.2026 : It is the case of the petitioner that the private respondents are trying to interfere with the possession of petitioner over the land situated at Mouza Hethu, P.S. Airport, Ranchi, Khata No.35, Plot No.737, measuring 80 decimals.
respondent No.5-Sub Divisional Officer, Ranchi by filing an appropriate application under Section 163 of the B.N.S.S., which will be considered as per law and an appropriate order will be passed in this case after hearing the parties.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
12th May, 2026 Madhav/Uploaded on:15 /05/2026
-2-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should grant relief against private respondents' alleged interference with the petitioner's possession of land in Mouza Hethu.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramesh Sahu
The State of Jharkhand
The Secretary for the Department of Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms, Jharkhand
The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi
Amar Singh
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
