Sheela Devi v. Welfare

Jharkhand HC14 Jan 2026WPC/1843/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sheela Devi (petitioner) vs State of Jharkhand and others (respondents); W.P. (S) No. 1843 of 2014; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; reference 2026:JHHC:1137; decided 14.01.2026 by Justice Deepak Roshan; writ application disposed of with liberty to file fresh writ application raising all grounds; pending interim application (I.A.) seeking amendment dismissed; respondents: Welfare Department officials and Tribal Welfare Research Institute; petitioner's counsel: Krishna Shankar; respondents' counsel: A.C. to AAG-IA.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ application taking all grounds raised in the instant writ application. ¶¶20

Sheela Devi Vs Welfare — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:1137

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

W.P. (S) No. 1843 of 2014

¶4

Sheela Devi wife of Late Ambika Prasad, resident of C/O Nagia Toppo, Professor Colony, Karamtoli, P.O. Morabadi, P.S. Lalpur, District Ranchi. .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Department of Welfare, Jharkhand Mantralaya, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.

¶8

The Special Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Department of Welfare, Jharkhand Mantralaya, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.

¶9

The Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Jharkhand at Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.

¶10

The Deputy Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Jharkhand at Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.

¶11

The Director, The Jharkhand Tribal Welfare Research Institute Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶12

The Deputy Director, The Jharkhand Tribal Welfare Research Institute Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶13

The Tribal Welfare Commisioner, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. .... Respondents

¶14

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

¶15

¶16

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Shankar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to AAG-IA

¶17

11/Dated:-14.01.2026

¶18

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some development has taken place; as such, the instant writ application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ application taking all the grounds what has been raised in the instant application.

¶19

2. There is no objection from the respondents.

¶20

3. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ application taking all grounds what has been taken in this writ application.

¶21

4. Pending I.A., seeking amendment, stands dismissed.

¶22

(Deepak Roshan, J.)

¶23

January 14, 2026 vikas/uploaded 16.01.2026

Sheela Devi v. Welfare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheela Devi v. Welfare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sudhanshu Shekhar Prajapati Vs the State of Jharkhand

Snehlata Vs the Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Public Commission, through Its Secretary

Akshoy Kumar Thakur Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms

Ajit Kumar Pandey Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Ministry of Rural Development

Abhinav Paul Minj Vs State of Jharkhand through Its Principal Secretary Department of Health