Disposed¶20

Devashish Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC9 Feb 2026LPA/473/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Letters Patent Appeal; leave to withdraw appeal with liberty to avail alternate remedy; all contentions left open; intervention application I.A. No. 10237 of 2025 disposed of; appellant Devashish Yadav (original petitioner); respondents include State of Jharkhand, Secretary (Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms), Deputy Commissioner, SDO, Sub-Registrar, Divisional Forest Officer and Circle Officer, Pakur, and Village Pradhan Sanjhl Murmu of Gokulpur; High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi; order dated 09.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Appeal withdrawn with leave: liberty granted to the appellant to avail the alternate remedy available to him; all contentions of all parties left open; intervention application I.A. No. 10237 of 2025 disposed of. ¶20

Devashish Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

 2026:JHHC:3367-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 473 of 2025

¶3

Devashish Yadav, S/o Raj Kumar Yadav, R/o Hatpara, PO-Pakur, PSPakur(T), District-Pakur ... ... Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand

¶6

The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi

¶7

The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur

¶8

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Pakur

¶9

The Sub-Registrar, Pakur

¶10

The Divisional Forest Officer, Pakur

¶11

The Circle Officer, Pakur

¶12

Village Pradhan of Gokulpur village namely, Sanjhl Murmu, W/o Rafaile Hansda, R/o Gokulpur, PO-Gokulpur, PS-Pakur(T), District-Pakur ... … Respondents

¶13

-----

¶14

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶15

For the Appellant : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Yogesh Modi, AC to AAG-IA For the Intervenor : Mr. Anup Kumar Agrawal, Advocate -----

¶16

Order No. 03 Dated: 09.02.2026

¶17

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

2. Learned counsel for the appellant (original petitioner) prays leave to

¶19

withdraw this appeal with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy available to the appellant.

¶20

3. Leave is granted with liberty as prayed for.

¶21

4. All contentions of all parties are, however, left open.