Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Harihar Yadav Vs State of Jharkhand — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Jharkhand HC (2026)

Home
Jharkhand HC
2026
Harihar Yadav Vs State of JharkhandHarihar Yadav v. State of Jharkhand

Dismissed

Harihar Yadav v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 Sept 2026Cr.A(SJ)/768/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Permitted withdrawal of criminal appeal with liberty to seek remedy elsewhere; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw criminal appeal with liberty to work out remedy elsewhere accorded.

What the court decided

Cite this judgement

Harihar Yadav v. State of Jharkhand, Cr.A(SJ)/768/2026 (JH), decided on 11 September 2026.

The High Court of Jharkhand publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

RAJESH KUMAR

Parties & counsel

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw criminal appeal with liberty to work out remedy elsewhere accorded.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

This criminal appeal was permitted to be withdrawn by the appellants with liberty to work out their remedy in accordance with law. The state had no objection. The appeal was dismissed accordingly.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

2026:JHHC:27360

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 768 of 2026

Harihar Yadav aged about 52 years, S/o Suryadev Yadav, R/o VillageTenudih, P.O. & P.S.-Pipra, District-Palamau (Jharkhand)

Pradeep Yadav aged about 25 years

Sandip Yadav aged about 22 years Both 2 and 3 are sons of Kapil Yadav, R/o Village-Tenudih, P.O. & P.S.Pipra, District-Palamau (Jharkhand)

.... .... …. Appellant(s)

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

Shambhu Paswan, S/o Nand Kumar Paswan, R/o Village-Tenudih, P.O. & P.S.-Pipra, Dist.-Palamau (Jharkhand)

.... .... .... Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

For the Appellant(s) : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Adv. Mr. Niranjan Kr. Sinha, Adv. Ms. Rashika Bhardwaj, Adv. For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, A.P.P. ------ Order No.04/Dated : 11.09.2026

On the instruction of the clients, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal with a liberty to work out their remedy in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, this criminal appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

( Rajesh Kumar, J. )

11.09.2026 Pawan/ Uploaded on 14.09.2026

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Harihar Yadav and others
respondent
The State of Jharkhand
respondent
Shambhu Paswan

Coram

AI extract

RAJESH KUMAR

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Jharkhand HC
Decided on: 11 Sept 2026 · September
Registered: 5 Aug 2026
Case no.: Cr.A(SJ)/768/2026
CNR: JHHC010263872026
Topic: Criminal Trial and Appeal
Disposal: Disposed Off

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…