The sole appellant died during the pendency of the criminal appeal. No legal-heir substitution application was filed. The court dismissed the appeal as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:28297
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 514 of 2018
Deo Lal Prasad ….. Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand through S.P., CBI, SPE, SCB, New Delhi ….. Respondent --------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Appellant(s) : Mrs. Aanya, Advocate. Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate. For the State-CBI : Mr. Prashant Pallav, A.S.G.I. Ms. Akanksha Agarwal, A.C. to A.S.G.I. Mr. Harsh Medhavrata, A.C. to A.S.G.I. ---------
Order No. 06/Dated: 17th September, 2026
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
September 17, 2026 Sunil/ Uploaded on 19.09.2026
Deo Lal Prasad
The State of Jharkhand through S.P., CBI, SPE, SCB, New Delhi
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
