Criminal appeal by two appellants against the State and a respondent. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal; permission was accorded and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 2026:JHHC:9434 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (SJ). No.399 of 2025
… Appellants
Versus
… Respondents
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Appellants : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P. For the Res. No.2 : Mr. Sachin Mahato, Advocate : Mr. Bhaiya V. Kumar, Advocate
------
Order No:-09 Dated:-02-04-2026
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Appeal.
Permission is accorded.
This Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
02/04/2026 Abhiraj/
Guddu Ray @ Guddu Kumar Yadav
Sanjay Ray @ Sanjay Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Ranjan Kachhap
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
