Disposed¶15

Sri Anil Sabarwal v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC10 Jul 2026Cr.Rev./995/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand HC Cr. Revision No. 995 of 2025; Anil Sabarwal v. State of Jharkhand & Vikash Kumar, Drug Inspector, Palamu; Quest Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.; certified copy of complaint petition; Drugs and Cosmetics Case No. 07/2024; Principal District Judge Palamau Daltonganj; grievance redressed; revision application disposed of; liberty to approach concerned court; non-bailable warrant of arrest; pending I.A. disposed of; Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:20457; Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay; decided 10-07-2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned court with respect to the issuance of the non-bailable warrant of arrest against him; pending I.A. disposed of. ¶15

Sri Anil Sabarwal Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:20457 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

Cr. Revision No. 995 of 2025

¶4

Sri Anil Sabarwal, S/o Late Captain Satyapal Sabarwal, Managing Director, M/S Quest Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., P-63, Onkar Marg, Gandhi Nagar, P.O. Sagor Kuti, P.S. Bagdoon Pithampur, District- Indore, Madhya Pradesh, PIN-453112, New Address: M/S Quest Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., P-45, Sector-3, Pithampur, P.O.- Sagaur, P.S.- Pigdampur, District- Dhar, Madhya Pradesh- 454775 ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The State of Jharkhand

¶7

2. Mr. Vikash Kumar, Drug Inspector, Palamu, Sadar Hospital Campus, P.O. + P.S. Medini Nagar, DistrictPalamu, Daltonganj, Jharkhand- 822101

¶8

... Opposite Parties

¶9

----------

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

¶11

For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Krishna Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl. P.P.

¶12

04/10.07.2026 Heard Mr. Abhishek Krishna Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Spl. P.P. for the State.

¶13

Mr. Abhishek Krishna Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that the learned Principal District Judge, Palamau, Daltonganj has passed an order for supply of the certified copy of the entire complaint petition in connection with Drugs and Cosmetics Case No. 07/2024 and he has already received the certified copy of the complaint petition along with its annexures. He has, therefore, submitted that the prayer made in this revision application has been redressed but at the same time learned counsel submits that since non-bailable warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner, he shall approach the concerned court for redressal of his grievance.

¶14

In view of the fact that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed as per the submissions

¶15

advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision application stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned court with respect to the subsequent development of issuance of non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioner.

¶16

Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of.

¶17

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)

¶18

Dated, the 10^th July, 2026 A. Sanga/Uploaded on 13 /07/2026

¶19

-2-

Sri Anil Sabarwal v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Anil Sabarwal v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abutalha Alias Abutlaha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Md. Kalim Ansari Vs Sabila Khatoon

Md. Aarif Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chandrashekhar Ojha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sohil Kumar Ray @ Karan Kumar Roy @ Sohil Roy Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pritam Kumar Pathak Vs the State of Jharkhand