Petitioners acquitted after trial in Lohardaga Mahila P.S. Case No. 25 of 2019 and sought withdrawal of their revision against the rejection of a discharge application. The High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:14545
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 506 of 2022
------
…. .... Petitioners Versus
.... .... Opp. Parties
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Petitioners : Ms. Sonal Sodhani, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.
------
Order No. 08 / Dated 12.05.2026
petitioners, after facing trial, have been acquitted in the case being Lohardaga Mahila P.S. Case No. 25 of 2019, therefore, present revision against the order dated 04.02.2022 rejecting the discharge application filed by the present petitioners, has become infructuous.
1
2026:JHHC:14545
infructuous.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
May 12, 2026 Sunil/
Uploaded on 14/05/2026
2
Amar Prasad Agrawal @ Amar Agrawal
Dilip Kumar Agrawal
Shiv Prasad Agrawal
Shankar Agrawal @ Ravi Shankar Prasad Agrawal @ Ravi Shankar Kumar
Deepak Kumar Agrawal
Meera Devi
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
