Petitioner's Cr. Revision did not get pressed and was dismissed. The order contains no legal proposition or substance.
The criminal revision was dismissed as it was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:27571 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 122 of 2026
Arun Kumar
… … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Parvati Kumari
3. Om Kumar
… … Opposite Parties
----------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, A.P.P.
04/14.09.2026 Mr. Om Prakash, learned counsel for the
petitioner does not press this application.
The same is dismissed as not pressed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Dated, the 14th September, 2026 A. Sanga/Uploaded on 15 /09/2026
Arun Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Parvati Kumari
Om Kumar
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
