20. We have gone through the impugned judgment, it transpires that only on the basis of testimony of P.W.2, Chameli Devi, who claimed to be eye-witness of the occurrence, the present appellant has been held guilty and sentenced and other three co-accused persons have been extended benefit of doubt. The evidence of P.W.-2 itself does not inspire confidence to be acted upon as wholly reliable witness. She has admitted inimical terms between her husband and the elder brother of appellant - Tejo Das and the criminal case of theft was also undergoing between them, in which, her husband was in jail for about 1½ years. Her statement was admittedly recorded by the I.O. after one day of the occurrence. Moreover, her testimony that she saw the accused - Tejo Das while committing murder of the deceased by inflicting farsi blow at about 6:00 P.M., neither she disclosed to her family members nor any of the villagers about the said occurrence and the dead body of deceased was seen for the first time by the Village Chaukidar (P.W.-1), who happens to be informant of this case. She also states that in her own house in the same courtyard Kishori Master along with his wife and sons resides,
