Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking restoration of a Bailable Application dismissed for non-compliance with a court order. The Court restored the matter to its original file.
B.A. No. 7579 of 2025 directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage as before dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:JHHC:27459]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.799 of 2026
Arvind Oraon @ Jhunjhun Oraon, aged about 24 years, S/OAmbir Oraon, Resident of Village – Ropokona, P.O. & P.S. Gudari, District – Gumla, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
… The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : Md. Parwez Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, Addl.P.P. ------
Order No:-03 Dated:-11-09-2026
Heard the parties.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of B.A. No. 7579 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 25.09.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that B.A. No. 7579 of 2025 was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 25.09.2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner of B.A. No. 7579 was directed to file a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith the copy of the certified copy of the charge sheet submitted in that case within two weeks but the certified copy of the charge sheet could not be obtained within the stipulated time, hence, the same could not be filed; which resulted in dismissal for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 25.09.2025. It is further submitted that non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 25.09.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. No. 7579 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced.
Hence, it is submitted that the B.A. No. 7579 of 2025 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel for the State has not raised any serious objection to the prayer of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, B.A. No. 7579 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list B.A. No. 7579 of 2025 before the appropriate Bench after a week.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Dated:- 11.09.2026 Saroj/
Arvind Oraon @ Jhunjhun Oraon
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
