Allowed

Bhikhan Ganjhu Alias Deepak Ganjhu Alias Neta Jee Alias Deepak Kumar v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 Sept 2026Cr.M.P./2603/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought restoration of a dismissed bail application due to inability to file a supplementary affidavit within the stipulated time because of unavoidable circumstances. The court restored the application to its original file.

What did the court decide?

B.A. No.5812 of 2026 was restored to its original file at the stage preceding its dismissal.

Bhikhan Ganjhu Alias Deepak Ganjhu Alias Neta Jee Alias… — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

( 2026:JHHC:27452 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2603 of 2026

¶2

Bhikhan Ganjhu @ Deepak Ganjhu @ Neta Jee @ Deepak Kumar, aged about 43 years, son of Late Bandhu Ganjhu, Resident of Village-Bijain, P.O.-Bahera, P.S.-Piparwar, District-Chatra, Jharkhand.

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P.

¶8

------

¶9

Order No:-03 Dated:-11-09-2026

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of B.A. No.5812 of 2026 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 13.07.2026.

¶12

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that B.A. No.5812 of 2026 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 13.07.2026 for filing the supplementary affidavit peremptorily within three weeks. It is next submitted that due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not file the said supplementary affidavit within the stipulated time ; which resulted in dismissal of the said B.A. No.5812 of 2026 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 13.07.2026. It is next submitted that noncompliance of peremptory order dated 13.07.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. No.5812 of 2026 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the B.A. No.5812 of 2026 be restored to its original file.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, B.A. No.5812 of 2026 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.

¶15

Registry is directed to list B.A. No.5812 of 2026 before the concerned Bench after a week.

¶16

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶17

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶18

11/09/2026 Abhiraj/

Bhikhan Ganjhu Alias Deepak Ganjhu Alias Neta Jee Alias Deepak Kumar v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhikhan Ganjhu Alias Deepak Ganjhu Alias Neta Jee Alias Deepak Kumar v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases