Dismissed

Deepshikha Mishra Alias Deep Sikha Mishra v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Sept 2026Cr.M.P./2542/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petition lacked merit and the petitioners were not diligent in prosecuting it.

What did the court decide?

Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for non-prosecution

Deepshikha Mishra Alias Deep Sikha Mishra Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

( 2026:JHHC:28031 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2542 of 2023

¶2

Deepshikha Mishra @ Deep Sikha Mishra @ Deepsikha Mishra, aged about 29 years, wife of Ravi Shankar Mishra, daughter of Ravindranath Tiwary, resident of villge –Hutup, Near Shalini Hospital, Rukka Road, P.O. –Irba, P.S. – Ormanjhi, District –Ranchi, Jharkhand, presently residing at Village and Post –Ataula, P.S. –Meral, District –Garhwa.

¶3

Surajdeo Pandey @ Suraj Dev Pandey, aged about 45 years, son of Madan Pandey, resident of Near T.V. Tower, Bairiya, P.O. and P.S. –Suduna, District –Palamau.

¶4

Aman Kumar Pandey @ Aman Pandey @ Tinku, aged about 27 years, son of Harinandan Pandey, resident of Village Kanke Kala, P.O. and P.S. –Patan, District –Palamau.

¶5

Pankaj Kumar Pandey @ Pawan Pandey @ Pankaj Pandey, aged about 36 years, son of Uday Nath Pandey, resident of Village –Kanke Kala, P.O. and P.S. –Patan, District – Palamau.

¶6

Sudhanshu Kumar Tiwary @ Sudhansu Tiwary, aged about 20 years, son of Chandrashekhar Tiwary, resident of Village –Chechariya, Post –Ataula, P.S. Meral, District –Garhwa.

¶7

Munjikesh Tiwary @ Munjikesh Tiwari @ Munjikesh Kumar Tiwari @ Munjkesh Tiwari, aged about 34 years, son of Ravindranath Tiwary.

¶8

Chandrashekhar Tiwary @ Chandra Sekhor Tiwary, aged about 45 years, son of Onkar Nath Tiwari

¶9

Praveen Kumar Mishra @ Praveen Mishra, aged about 25 years, son of Mathura Mishra Petitioner No. 6 to 8 are residents of Ataula, P.O. and P.S. Meral, District –Garhwa.

¶10

Umanand Pandey @ Nanhak Pandey @ Umakant Pandey, aged about 50 years, son of Madan Pandey, resident of Kakekala, P.O. and P.S. –Patan, District –Palamau.

¶11

.... .... …. Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State of Jharkhand

¶14

.... .... .... Opp. Party

¶15

------

¶16

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶17

For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate ------

¶18

Order No.09 Dated- 16.09.2026

¶19

No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners’ in-spite of repeated

¶20

calls.

¶21

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State submits that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this criminal miscellaneous petition as there is no merit in this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶23

16.09.2026

¶24

Sonu-

Deepshikha Mishra Alias Deep Sikha Mishra v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepshikha Mishra Alias Deep Sikha Mishra v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases