The High Court dismissed a petition to quash an FIR as infructuous because the police had already filed a final report for lack of evidence and had not sent the petitioner for trial, leaving no justifiable reason to quash the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:JHHC:28061]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2351 of 2023
------
Ajay Kumar Singh, aged about 34 years, son of Sri Birbal Singh, presently residing at 100B IKON Heights, Bahubazar, Pragati Path, near Ice Factory, Ranchi, Post Office & P.S. Chutiya District Ranchi (Jharkhand).
… Petitioner
Versus
… Opposite Parties
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate ------
P R E S E N T
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
By the Court:
1 Cr. M.P. No.2351 of 2023
[2026:JHHC:28061]
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 16th of September, 2026 AFR/ Saroj
Uploaded on 17/09/2026
2 Cr. M.P. No.2351 of 2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report should be quashed when the police have already submitted a final report for lack of evidence and have not sent the petitioner for trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Ekta Singh
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
