The single-judge Bench of the Jharkhand High Court restored Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 to its original file after it was wrongly dismissed due to the petitioner's inadvertence in failing to mark the list. The state did not oppose the restoration.
Restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 to its original file before the concerned Bench after a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 2026:JHHC:27446 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2197 of 2026
… Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Parties -----CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.
------
Order No:-04 Dated:-11-09-2026
Heard the parties.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 03.12.2025.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 03.12.2025 by this Court. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the petitioner could not mark the list, hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court when the said Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 was called out, resulting in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that nonprosecution before this Court on 03.12.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly
prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
11/09/2026 Abhiraj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.3094 of 2022 should be restored to its original file after being dismissed for non-prosecution due to inadvertence.
Pintu Dutta and Others
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
