The single-judge bench allowed the petitioner's plea to withdraw a writ petition and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application was accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 2026:JHHC:27613 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 184 of 2026
-------
Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar, aged about 55 years, son of Ram Pravesh Singh, resident of village Tenduwakala, P.O. & P.S. Hariharganj, District Palamau. ...... …. Petitioner (s)
...... …. Petitioner (s) Versus
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
-------For the Petitioner (s) : Mr. Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the State : A.A.G-III
Order No. 05/ Dated 14.09.2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application, in view of the averments made in paras 16 & 17 of the counter affidavit, in which, it has been stated that the petitioner should have approached the competent authority, mentioned therein for getting a copy of the postmortem report.
Permission is accorded.
This application is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Dated 14/09/2026
BS/-
Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
The Registrar, Civil Court, Palamau
The Public Information Officer-cum-Civil Surgeon, Palamau
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
