Dismissed¶21

Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC1 Apr 2026W.P.(Cr.)/171/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand HC (Ranchi), W.P. (Cr.) (H.B) (D.B) No. 171 of 2026, Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kumar v. State of Jharkhand & others (incl. DGP, SSP/SP Ranchi, SHO Bundu P.S., Ramsudhir Mahto family) — dismissed as not pressed on 01.04.2026 by Sujit Narayan Prasad and Sanjay Prasad, JJ., after petitioner's counsel withdrew; non-speaking order, no substantive ruling.

What did the court decide?

The instant petition, being W.P. (Cr.) (H.B) (D.B) No. 171 of 2026, is dismissed as not pressed and stands disposed of, in view of the petitioner's counsel's statement that she did not want to press the writ petition. ¶21

Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:9237-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

W.P. (Cr.) (H.B) (D.B) No. 171 of 2026

¶4

Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kumar, Aged about 19 years, S/o-Dharm Nath Shahni, R/o- Paura Madan Singh, P.O.- Paura, P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali, State- Bihar, Present address-347, Chimni Road No.3, P.O.+P.S. Simpapuri, District-Ludhiana, Punjab. …. --- Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand

¶7

The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, having office at the Police Headquarters, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶8

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, having office at Collectorate Building, P.O. GP.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police (Rural), having office at Collectorate Building, P.O. GP.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶10

The Station House Officer, Bundu P.S., P.O.+P.S.- Bundu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶11

Ramsudhir Mahto, aged about 46 years, S/o- Sohrai Mahto, Vill- College More, P.O.+P.S.- Bundu, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶12

Sulochana Devi, aged about 36 years, W/o- Ramsudhir Mahto, R/o- 58, College More, Bundu, P.O.+P.S.- Bundu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶13

Rajkumar Mahto, age not known, S/o- Ramsudhir Mahto, R/o- 58, College More, P.O.+P.S.- Bundu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶14

…. --Respondents

¶15

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

¶16

¶17

For the Petitioner: Ms. Nisha Kumari, Advocate For the State: Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III ---

¶18

02 / 01.04.2026 Ms. Nisha Kumari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on

¶19

instruction, has submitted that she does not want to press this writ petition.

¶20

In view of the above, the instant petition, being W.P. (Cr.) (H.B) (D.B)

¶21

No. 171 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed, accordingly, stands disposed of.

¶22

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶23

(Sanjay Prasad, J.)

¶24

Date: 01.04.2026 RKM.

¶25

Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikki Kumar @ Vicky Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanicharwa Manjhi @ Mangla Manjhi Vs Atwari Devi

Union of India through Secretary, Department of Post Vs Ram Sewak Mahto

Zeshaan Shekh Alias Ricky Vs the State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary

Velji Ratna Sorathia Infra Private Limited Rep. through Its Authorized Signatory Kumar Vikram Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sri Ajay Kumar Vs Smt Kiran

Vijay Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secy, Dept of Home, Prison and Disaster Management