Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Cr.M.P. No. 3327 of 2023 was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 09.04.2026. It is next submitted that prayer for time of the petitioner of Cr.M.P. No. 3327 of 2023 was allowed subject to deposit of Rs.2,000/- by the petitioners with JHALSA within three weeks but inadvertently, the said deposit could not be made within the stipulated time as the counsel missed to take note of the said peremptory order; which resulted in dismissal for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 09.04.2026. Now the petitioners made the said deposit and the copy of which has been annexed with supplementary affidavit. It is further submitted that non-appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioners was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No. 3327 of 2023 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No. 3327 of 2023 be restored to its original file.
