An application under S.C. Rules/ CPC for contempt alleging violation of a writ order. The court found no wilful violation as the Accountant General had disbursed the amount. The contempt application was dropped.
The contempt application is dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:27382
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 947 of 2026
Emrencia Kerketta, Wife of Late Astik Munda, Village + P.O.Gamhariya, PS-Baharagora, Dist-East Singhbhum, presently residing at House No.166, New Baradwari, PO-Sakchi, PS-Sakchi, Town, Jamshedpur, Dist-East Singhbhum.
… … Petitioner(s)
Versus
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Janak Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vikas Pandey, Adv. Mr. Deepak Kr. Singh, Adv. For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, AC to SC-IV
02/ 11th September, 2026
1. Heard the parties.
2. There is no wilful violation of the order of this Court, as the Accountant General has disbursed the amount in favour of the petitioner in whose favour the order was passed in the writ petition. 3. Thus, no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt application is dropped.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
11th September, 2026 S.K.D/CP-2
Uploaded on 14/09/2026
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is wilful violation of the pending writ petition order amount being disbursed qualifies as contempt
Emrencia Kerketta
The State of Jharkhand
Chandra Mauli Singh
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
