Counsel for the petitioner in Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1001 of 2026 sought and was granted permission to withdraw the contumacious case with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, after which the case was dismissed.
Nil
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:28131
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1001 of 2026
….
Sushma Kumari, wife of Haradhan Bedia, daughter of Jai Krishna Lal, aged about 40 years, resident of Village – Ghutuwa, P.O.NTS Barkakana, P.S. – Patratu, District – Ramgarh (Jharkhand) ……Petitioner
Versus
……Opp. Parties
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Asit Baran Mahto, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, APP
Order No.02/16th September, 2026
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Dated 16.09.2026 Nishant/-
Sushma Kumari
The State of Jharkhand
Haradhan Bedia
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
