Disposed¶22

Lily Kumari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC14 Mar 2026Acq. App./85/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat award; Acquittal App No.85 of 2024; Lily Kumari @ Lili Kumari v. State of Jharkhand & Sanjay Kumar Kashyap; Jharkhand High Court; National Lok Adalat 14.03.2026; settlement per mediation report dated 16.02.2026; 2nd instalment Rs. 7,50,000/- draft No. 025111 dated 11.03.2026; Section 19 Legal Services Authorities Act 1987; Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary; Advocate Member Amrita Sinha; appeal disposed in terms of mediation report.

What did the court decide?

Acquittal Appeal No. 85 of 2024 disposed of in terms of the mediation report dated 16.02.2026, upon noting payment of the 2nd instalment of Rs. 7,50,000/-; mediation report to form part of the settlement order and to be furnished with the certified copy. ¶22

Lily Kumari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:7089

¶2

AWARD

¶3

BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT (PHYSICAL)

¶4

DATED 14.03.2026 (Held at JHARKHAND HIGH COURT)

¶5

(Organized by High Court Legal Services Committee under Section 19, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act).

¶6

Acquittal App No.85 of 2024

¶7

Petitioner(s)/ Appellant(s):-

¶8

Lily Kumari @ Lili Kumari, aged about 37 years, W/o:- Sanjay Kumar Kashyap and D/o- Shravan Ravidas, R/o- Bharti Bhavan Vikas Nagar, P.O.- Jag Jeevan Nagar, P.S.- Saraidela, District-Dhanbad, (Jharkhand).

¶9

At present of Jharna Colony, Quarter No. 345/B, P.O. & P.S.- Sahebganj, DistrictSahebganj (Jharkhand)

¶10

Versus

¶11

Respondent/O.P.(s):

¶12

The State of Jharkhand

¶13

Sanjay Kumar Kashyap @ Sanjay Kashyap, S/o- Sri Baldin Ram, R/o- Bharti Bhavan, Vikash Nagar, P.O.- Jag Jeevan Nagar, P.S.- Saraidela, District- Dhanbad, (Jharkhand).

¶14

Present:-

¶15

Name of the Hon’ble Judge:- Name of Advocate Member	Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary : - Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate
For the petitioner	:- Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate
For the State	:- Mr. R. Vardhan, A.P.P

¶16

AWARD

¶17

This matter is taken up in National Lok Adalat.

¶18

The appellant and the opposite party No. 2 are present in person. They have submitted self-attested copy of aadhar.

¶19

Learned counsel for the State is also present.

¶20

It has been jointly submitted that the matter between the parties has been settled in terms of mediation report dated 16.02.2026. A draft of Rs. 7,50,000/- bearing No. 025111 dated 11.03.2026 being the 2^nd instalment has been handed over to the Opposite Party No.2 during the proceeding. A receipt of the same is also taken and placed on record.

¶21

2026:JHHC:7089

¶22

This Acquittal Appeal is disposed of in terms of the mediation report and upon

¶23

noting the payment of 2^nd instalment of Rs.7,50,000/-.

¶24

The mediation report is directed to form part of this settlement order and at the time of issuance of certified copy of this order, a copy of the mediation report be also furnished by the office along with the certified copy of the order.

¶25

Petitioner/Plaintiff/Appellant Respondent/O.P

¶26

………………………….. ……………………….. Sig. of Hon’ble Judge Sign. Of Advocate Member (Seal of HCLSC)

Lily Kumari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lily Kumari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kumar Mahato Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sunil Kalindi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Prem Dome Alias Sona Alias Sona Babu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Azhar Nawab Vs the Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Tapeshwar Alias Tameshwar Roy Vs the State of Jharkhand

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. through Its Deputy Manager Vs Pramila Devi