Allowed

Sujit Kumar Choudhary v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 Sept 2026C.M.P./980/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Civil Misc. Petition seeking restoration of a dismissed Writ Petition (S) No.6727 of 2022 was allowed. The apex court directed the petitioner to remove any surviving defects within four weeks, with an unconditional apology accepted from the petitioner's counsel.

What did the court decide?

Civil Misc. Petition C.M.P. No.980 of 2026 allowed; Writ Petition (S) No.6727 of 2022 restored to original file.

Sujit Kumar Choudhary Vs the State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:JHHC:27421

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.980 of 2026

¶3

Sujit Kumar Choudhary, son of Late Ram Kumar Choudhary, resident of Chutia Main Road, Ward No.24, Amar Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Chutia, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand.

¶6

Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi.

¶7

District Disaster Management Officer-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum.

¶8

Programme Director National Health Mission, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi.

¶9

District Programme Manager NHM, Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum.

¶10

Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum.

¶11

… … Opposite Parties

¶12

CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

¶13

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Advocate, Through V.C.

¶14

For the O.P. (s) : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, AC to SC-V

¶15

02/ 11.09.2026

¶16

Learned counsel Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, appeared through virtual mode. There is no complaint with regard to quality or clarity in the audio and the video.

¶17

2. Heard the parties.

¶18

3. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of writ petition being W.P.(S) No.6727 of 2022, which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 09.02.2026, as the defects have not been removed since last one year.

¶19

4. Learned counsel representing the petitioner begs an unconditional apology and submits that no sooner the writ petition

¶20

¶21

2026:JHHC:27421

¶22

is restored to its original file, he will remove the surviving defect.

¶23

5. Learned counsel representing the opposite parties do not oppose the aforesaid submission.

¶24

6. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioner, this Civil Misc. Petition is allowed .

¶25

7. The writ petition being W.P.(S) No.6727 of 2022, is restored to its original file with a condition that the defect, if any, is still not removed, the same shall be removed within four weeks, failing which, this order will not be given effect to.

¶26

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

¶27

11^th September, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2

¶28

Uploaded on 14.09.2026

¶29

Sujit Kumar Choudhary v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Kumar Choudhary v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases