Allowed

Sattar Sk Alias Sattar Shaikh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Sept 2026B.A./8584/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Health Minister, the court granted bail to the petitioner in a narcotics case. The petitioner was charged with selling brown sugar (heroin) and possession of the same. The court released him on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions to cooperate with the trial and not interfere with witnesses. (2026:JHHC:27869) [15 Words]

What did the court decide?

Petitioner admitted to bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with trial and no interference with witnesses.

Sattar Sk Alias Sattar Shaikh Vs the State of Jharkhand — Narcotics (NDPS) | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

( 2026:JHHC:27869 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8584 of 2026

¶2

Sattar Sk @ Sattar Shaikh, Age 54 years, S/o Samser Ali @ Samser Shaikh, R/o Vill-Manirampur, P.O. –Manirampur, P.S. Pakur (M), District –Pakur (Jharkhand).

¶3

… Petitioner Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶5

------

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

For the Petitioner : Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P.

¶8

------

¶9

Order No.02 Dated- 15.09.2026

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No.104 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111 of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 21(a) & 22(a) of the NDPS Act.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in selling brown sugar which is also known as heroin and 30.43 gram of brown sugar was recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.08.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

¶13

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶14

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named

¶15

petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (NDPS), Pakur, in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No.104 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

15.09.2026 Sonu/

Sattar Sk Alias Sattar Shaikh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sattar Sk Alias Sattar Shaikh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases