Disposed¶13

Dhaneshwar Prasad Yadav Alias Dhaneshwar Gope v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Feb 2026A.B.A./857/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail, Jharkhand High Court, 2026; A. B. A. No. 857 of 2026; BNS Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 118, 109 read with Section 3(5); Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025; petitioner and informant agnates; land dispute; free fight; simple injury; direction to surrender within two weeks; release on terms, conditions and sureties; Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned court within two weeks, whereupon the learned court shall release him on terms, conditions and sureties as it deems fit and proper. ¶13

Dhaneshwar Prasad Yadav Alias Dhaneshwar Gope Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

 ( 2026:JHHC:4229 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

A. B. A. No. 857 of 2026

¶4

Dhaneshwar Prasad Yadav @ Dhaneshwar Gope, aged about 70 years, son of Laxman Gope, resident of village- Akdoni Khurd, P.O. Beniadih, P.S. Giridih (Muff), District-Giridih ...... … Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party

¶6

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Mahesh Kr. Sinha, (2), Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, A.P.P.

¶8

02/ 16.02.2026 : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶9

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 280 of 2025, registered under sections 126 (2), 115(2), 352, 351 (2), 118, 109 read with section 3 (5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Giridih.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and informant are agnates and altercation took place due to land dispute and in hit of moment there was free fight between the parties. He next submits that injury has been found to be simple in nature. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there.

¶12

Considering that petitioner and informant are agnates and altercation took place due to land dispute and in hit of moment there was free fight between the parties and in that view of the matter, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and the learned court shall release the petitioner on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit and proper.

¶13

This anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

¶14

( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶15

satyarthi-

¶16

Dt.16.02.2026

Dhaneshwar Prasad Yadav Alias Dhaneshwar Gope v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhaneshwar Prasad Yadav Alias Dhaneshwar Gope v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mujaffar Alam Alias Mujkar Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rajeev Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sanu Phalahari Alias Subham Satwik Vs the State of Jharkhand

Samir Khan Vs State of Jharkhand

Tajuddin Ansari Alias Charku Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pintoo Yadav Alias Pintoo Kumar Yadav Vs State of Jharkhand