Allowed

Nokimuddin Shaikh @ Nakimuddin Shekh v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Sept 2026B.A./8553/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand enlarged the petitioner on bail in a case involving attempted murder and related offences, directing the surrender of a bail bond and furnishing of sureties and personal identifiers with specific undertakings to cooperate and not disturb witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and complying with specified conditions.

Nokimuddin Shaikh @ Nakimuddin Shekh Vs State… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

( 2026:JHHC:27764 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8553 of 2026

¶2

------

¶3

Nokimuddin Shaikh @ Nakimuddin Shekh, aged about 65 years, S/o Late Jasimuddin Shekh, resident of Village-Rahaspur, P.O.Rahaspur, P.S.-Pakur(M), District-Pakur (Jharkhand).

¶4

.... .... …. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party

¶7

------

¶8

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶9

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Advocate

¶10

Order No.02 Dated- 15-09-2026

¶11

Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.103 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 351(1) & 352 of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to commit murder of Nusrat Jahan by throttling her neck. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner first instituted Complaint Case No.214 of 2026 against the husband of the informant and others and as a counterblast, this false case has been foisted. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.08.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

¶14

The learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

¶15

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as

¶16

discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur, in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.103 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case .

¶17

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶18

15/09/2026 Abhiraj/

Nokimuddin Shaikh @ Nakimuddin Shekh v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nokimuddin Shaikh @ Nakimuddin Shekh v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases