Allowed

Krishna Kumar Saha v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Sept 2026B.A./8463/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to an accused under NDPS Act involving sale and purchase of Ganja and brown sugar, directing furnishing of a bond with conditions to cooperate with trial and not disturb witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Accused directed to be enlarged on bail furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and undertaking to cooperate with trial and not disturb witnesses.

Krishna Kumar Saha Vs the State of Jharkhand — Narcotics (NDPS) | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

[ 2026:JHHC:27771 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8463 of 2026

¶3

------

¶4

Krishna Kumar Saha, aged about – 33 years, Son of Bhim Saha, Resident of Village – Tarapur, Santhali, P.O. & P.S. Hiranpur, District – Pakur.

¶5

.... .... …. Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Jharkhand

¶8

.... .... .... Opposite Party

¶9

------

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶11

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P.

¶12

------

¶13

Order No:-02 Dated:-15-09-2026

¶14

Heard the parties.

¶15

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 40 of 2026 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(b), 22(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase Ganja and brown sugar which is also known as Heroin; from the petitioner and the co-accused, altogether 1.600 kg of Ganja and 25 grams of brown sugar was recovered which comes under intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.06.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, NDPS, Pakur in connection with Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 40 of 2026 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

¶19

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶20

Dated:-15.09.2026 Saroj/

Krishna Kumar Saha v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Kumar Saha v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases