Allowed

Kailash Das @ Kailosh Das v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Sept 2026B.A./8222/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Ranchi allowed bail application of Kailash Das, a first-time offender in a cyber-crime case under BNS 2023 and IT Act, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties on specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Directing petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties on specified conditions.

Kailash Das @ Kailosh Das Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:JHHC:27827

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

B.A. No. 8222 of 2026

¶4

Kailash Das @ Kailosh Das, Aged about 23 years, Son of Jayram Das, Resident of Jhunaki, P.O & P.S.-Pathardah, District Deoghar.

¶5

… … Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party

¶8

¶9

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

¶10

--For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P.

¶11

03 /15.09.2026

¶12

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

¶13

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 111 (2) (b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66 (C), 66(D) and 84 (C) of the Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Cyber-Crime Cases, Deoghar.

¶14

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent. It has been submitted that 2 mobile and 1 SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has also submitted that 2 crime links have been found during investigation and 2 victims have been identified.

¶15

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.

¶16

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty

¶17

¶18

2026:JHHC:27827

¶19

five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026 on the following conditions:

¶20

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

¶21

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

¶22

(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

¶23

(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

¶24

(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

¶25

6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

¶26

7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.

¶27

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

¶28

Uploaded on:-16.09.2026

¶29

15.09.2026 Rakesh/-

¶30

Kailash Das @ Kailosh Das v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Das @ Kailosh Das v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases